lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1535727379-17133-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:56:19 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix update_blocked_averages() for dl and rt

update_blocked_averages() is called to periodiccally decay the stalled load
of idle CPUs and to sync all loads before running load balance.

When cfs rq is idle, it trigs a load balance during pick_next_task_fair()
in order to potentially pull tasks and to use this newly idle CPU. This
load balance happens whereas prev task from another class has not been put
and its utilization updated yet. This may lead to wrongly account running
time as idle time for rt or dl classes.

Test that no rt or dl task is running when updating their utilization in
update_blocked_averages().

We still update rt and dl utilization instead of simply skipping them to
make sure that all metrics are synced when used during load balance.

Fixes: 371bf4273269 ("sched/rt: Add rt_rq utilization tracking")
Fixes: 3727e0e16340 ("sched/dl: Add dl_rq utilization tracking")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---

-V2 
  - Add missing fixes tags
  - apply fix to other version of update_blocked_averages


 kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 309c93f..bc1de21 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7262,6 +7262,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *pos;
+	const struct sched_class *curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
 	struct rq_flags rf;
 	bool done = true;
 
@@ -7298,8 +7299,8 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
 		if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
 			done = false;
 	}
-	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
-	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
+	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
+	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
 	update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
 	/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
 	if (others_have_blocked(rq))
@@ -7364,13 +7365,14 @@ static inline void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
+	const struct sched_class *curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
 	struct rq_flags rf;
 
 	rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 	update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
-	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
-	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
+	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
+	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
 	update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 	rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick = jiffies;
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ