linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ata: ahci_platform: support allwinner R40 AHCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:52:52 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ata: ahci_platform: support allwinner R40 AHCI

On 8/30/18 8:32 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:31 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/30/18 1:01 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> This patchset add support for allwinner R40 AHCI controller.
>>>
>>> The whole patchset is tested on sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra and
>>> on sun7i-a20-cubieboard2 which doesnt have any of the ressources added
>>> by this serie, so no regression should come with it.
>>>
>>> The last patch(ata: ahci_sunxi: remove PHY code) should not be merged,
>>> but will be resent for inclustion when all patchs will have hit linus
>>> tree.
>>
>> Applied 1-12 with Hans's blessing, thanks Corentin.
> 
> Please don't merge device tree ("dts") patches, i.e. patches 9-12. We will
> merge them through the sunxi / armsoc tree. Having them in separate trees
> introduces conflicts when we have other stuff going through our tree.

OK, fair enough, I can drop those.

-- 
Jens Axboe