[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180831230902.GC1488037@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:09:02 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] blkcg: update blkg_lookup_create to do locking
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:53:46PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@...il.com>
>
> To know when to create a blkg, the general pattern is to do a
> blkg_lookup and if that fails, lock and then do a lookup again and if
> that fails finally create. It doesn't make much sense for everyone who
> wants to do creation to write this themselves.
>
> This changes blkg_lookup_create to do locking and implement this
> pattern. The old blkg_lookup_create is renamed to __blkg_lookup_create.
> If a call site wants to do its own error handling or already owns the
> queue lock, they can use __blkg_lookup_create.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
It looks a bit weird w/o actual users, might be worthwhile to mention
that future patches will add users.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists