[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809012347390.25787@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 23:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Access to non-RAM pages
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Al Viro wrote:
> IMO that's crap. In absolute majority of cases there is a guaranteed gap
> between the end of accessed object and the next page boundary.
So if that's the case, you're absolutely right. But I am unable to find
any such guarantee in our current code though.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists