linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 13/89] blk-mq: fix updating tags depth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180902064918.183387-13-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Date:   Sun, 2 Sep 2018 13:06:25 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 13/89] blk-mq: fix updating tags depth

From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 75d6e175fc511e95ae3eb8f708680133bc211ed3 ]

The passed 'nr' from userspace represents the total depth, meantime
inside 'struct blk_mq_tags', 'nr_tags' stores the total tag depth,
and 'nr_reserved_tags' stores the reserved part.

There are two issues in blk_mq_tag_update_depth() now:

1) for growing tags, we should have used the passed 'nr', and keep the
number of reserved tags not changed.

2) the passed 'nr' should have been used for checking against
'tags->nr_tags', instead of number of the normal part.

This patch fixes the above two cases, and avoids kernel crash caused
by wrong resizing sbitmap queue.

Cc: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Tested by: Marco Patalano <mpatalan@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 6714507aa6c7..3d2ab65d2dd1 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -416,8 +416,6 @@ int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	if (tdepth <= tags->nr_reserved_tags)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	tdepth -= tags->nr_reserved_tags;
-
 	/*
 	 * If we are allowed to grow beyond the original size, allocate
 	 * a new set of tags before freeing the old one.
@@ -437,7 +435,8 @@ int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		if (tdepth > 16 * BLKDEV_MAX_RQ)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		new = blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(set, hctx->queue_num, tdepth, 0);
+		new = blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(set, hctx->queue_num, tdepth,
+				tags->nr_reserved_tags);
 		if (!new)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		ret = blk_mq_alloc_rqs(set, new, hctx->queue_num, tdepth);
@@ -454,7 +453,8 @@ int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		 * Don't need (or can't) update reserved tags here, they
 		 * remain static and should never need resizing.
 		 */
-		sbitmap_queue_resize(&tags->bitmap_tags, tdepth);
+		sbitmap_queue_resize(&tags->bitmap_tags,
+				tdepth - tags->nr_reserved_tags);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.17.1