linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.18 081/131] f2fs: try grabbing node page lock aggressively in sync scenario

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 2 Sep 2018 13:04:46 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, Yunlei He <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.18 081/131] f2fs: try grabbing node page lock
 aggressively in sync scenario

From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 4b270a8cc5047682f0a3f3f9af3b498408dbd2bc ]

In synchronous scenario, like in checkpoint(), we are going to flush
dirty node pages to device synchronously, we can easily failed
writebacking node page due to trylock_page() failure, especially in
condition of intensive lock competition, which can cause long latency
of checkpoint(). So let's use lock_page() in synchronous scenario to
avoid this issue.

Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 10643b11bd59..b949002e52a7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1633,7 +1633,9 @@ int f2fs_sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 						!is_cold_node(page)))
 				continue;
 lock_node:
-			if (!trylock_page(page))
+			if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
+				lock_page(page);
+			else if (!trylock_page(page))
 				continue;
 
 			if (unlikely(page->mapping != NODE_MAPPING(sbi))) {
-- 
2.17.1