linux-kernel - [GIT pull] smp/hotplug updates for 4.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <153588048102.6192.6508499255634186747.tglx@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 02 Sep 2018 11:28:55 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [GIT pull] smp/hotplug updates for 4.19

Linus,

please pull the latest smp-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git smp-urgent-for-linus

Remove the stale skip_onerr member from the hotplug states.

Thanks,

	tglx

------------------>
Mukesh Ojha (1):
      cpu/hotplug: Remove skip_onerr field from cpuhp_step structure


 kernel/cpu.c | 26 ++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index ed44d7d34c2d..aa7fe85ad62e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ static inline void cpuhp_lock_release(bool bringup) { }
  * @name:	Name of the step
  * @startup:	Startup function of the step
  * @teardown:	Teardown function of the step
- * @skip_onerr:	Do not invoke the functions on error rollback
- *		Will go away once the notifiers	are gone
  * @cant_stop:	Bringup/teardown can't be stopped at this step
  */
 struct cpuhp_step {
@@ -119,7 +117,6 @@ struct cpuhp_step {
 					 struct hlist_node *node);
 	} teardown;
 	struct hlist_head	list;
-	bool			skip_onerr;
 	bool			cant_stop;
 	bool			multi_instance;
 };
@@ -550,12 +547,8 @@ static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static void undo_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st)
 {
-	for (st->state--; st->state > st->target; st->state--) {
-		struct cpuhp_step *step = cpuhp_get_step(st->state);
-
-		if (!step->skip_onerr)
-			cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, st->state, false, NULL, NULL);
-	}
+	for (st->state--; st->state > st->target; st->state--)
+		cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, st->state, false, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 static int cpuhp_up_callbacks(unsigned int cpu, struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st,
@@ -644,12 +637,6 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpuhp_is_ap_state(state));
 
-	if (st->rollback) {
-		struct cpuhp_step *step = cpuhp_get_step(state);
-		if (step->skip_onerr)
-			goto next;
-	}
-
 	if (cpuhp_is_atomic_state(state)) {
 		local_irq_disable();
 		st->result = cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, state, bringup, st->node, &st->last);
@@ -673,7 +660,6 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
 		st->should_run = false;
 	}
 
-next:
 	cpuhp_lock_release(bringup);
 
 	if (!st->should_run)
@@ -916,12 +902,8 @@ void cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void)
 
 static void undo_cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st)
 {
-	for (st->state++; st->state < st->target; st->state++) {
-		struct cpuhp_step *step = cpuhp_get_step(st->state);
-
-		if (!step->skip_onerr)
-			cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, st->state, true, NULL, NULL);
-	}
+	for (st->state++; st->state < st->target; st->state++)
+		cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, st->state, true, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 static int cpuhp_down_callbacks(unsigned int cpu, struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st,