linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 18/30] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: rework: support multiple sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:29:27 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Philipp Rossak <embed3d@...il.com>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        maxime.ripard@...tlin.com, wens@...e.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        eugen.hristev@...rochip.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        vilhelm.gray@...il.com, clabbe.montjoie@...il.com,
        quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        lukas@...ner.de, icenowy@...c.io, arnd@...db.de,
        broonie@...nel.org, arnaud.pouliquen@...com,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/30] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: rework: support
 multiple sensors

On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:58:30 +0200
Philipp Rossak <embed3d@...il.com> wrote:

> On 02.09.2018 22:11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > This feels like a good place to factor out the code into a utility
> > function that just does one of them.  That should hopefully
> > reduce the indenting etc enough to make the code easier to read.
> >   
> >> +		info->tzds[i].info = info;
> >> +		info->tzds[i].sensor_id = i;
> >> +
> >> +		info->tzds[i].tzd = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> >> +				info->sensor_device,
> >> +				i, &info->tzds[i], &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Do not fail driver probing when failing to register in
> >> +		 * thermal because no thermal DT node is found.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		if (IS_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd) && \
> >> +				PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd) != -ENODEV) {
> >> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >> +				"could not register thermal sensor: %ld\n",
> >> +				PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd));
> >> +			return PTR_ERR(info->tzds[i].tzd);
> >> +		}  
> 
> So this code above should be placed in a separate function and called by 
> the for loop?
> Did I understand that right?
Yes - exactly.

> 
> Philipp