lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180903165723.375178687@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Sep 2018 18:57:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 091/123] s390/numa: move initial setup of node_to_cpumask_map

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>

commit fb7d7518b0d65955f91c7b875c36eae7694c69bd upstream.

The numa_init_early initcall sets the node_to_cpumask_map[0] to the
full cpu_possible_mask. Unfortunately this early_initcall is too late,
the NUMA setup for numa=emu is done even earlier. The order of calls
is numa_setup() -> emu_update_cpu_topology(), then the early_initcalls(),
followed by sched_init_domains().

Starting with git commit 051f3ca02e46432c0965e8948f00c07d8a2f09c0
"sched/topology: Introduce NUMA identity node sched domain"
the incorrect node_to_cpumask_map[0] really screws up the domain
setup and the kernel panics with the follow oops:

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.15+
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/numa/numa.c |   16 ++--------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/numa/numa.c
+++ b/arch/s390/numa/numa.c
@@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ void __init numa_setup(void)
 {
 	pr_info("NUMA mode: %s\n", mode->name);
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
+	/* Initially attach all possible CPUs to node 0. */
+	cpumask_copy(&node_to_cpumask_map[0], cpu_possible_mask);
 	if (mode->setup)
 		mode->setup();
 	numa_setup_memory();
@@ -141,20 +143,6 @@ void __init numa_setup(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * numa_init_early() - Initialization initcall
- *
- * This runs when only one CPU is online and before the first
- * topology update is called for by the scheduler.
- */
-static int __init numa_init_early(void)
-{
-	/* Attach all possible CPUs to node 0 for now. */
-	cpumask_copy(&node_to_cpumask_map[0], cpu_possible_mask);
-	return 0;
-}
-early_initcall(numa_init_early);
-
-/*
  * numa_init_late() - Initialization initcall
  *
  * Register NUMA nodes.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ