[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180903193806.GA11258@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:38:06 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] 9p: fix spelling mistake in fall-through annotation
Replace "fallthough" with a proper "fall through" annotation.
This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402012 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index 5f2e48d..374bc1c 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_do_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
break;
default:
WARN_ONCE(1, "unknown lock status code: %d\n", status);
- /* fallthough */
+ /* fall through */
case P9_LOCK_ERROR:
case P9_LOCK_GRACE:
res = -ENOLCK;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists