linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/14] mmc: mmci: internalize dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoWPcWmjgivNVUeLR6j-_KUY-O-aJfgdh3dhQKL3oPedQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:15:07 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@...com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Gerald Baeza <gerald.baeza@...com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] mmc: mmci: internalize dma_inprogress into mmci dma functions

On 1 August 2018 at 11:36, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@...com> wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
>
> This patch internalizes the dma_inprogress into mmci dma interfaces.
> This allows to simplify and prepare the next dma callbacks
> for mmci host ops. __dma_inprogress is called in mmci_dma_data_error
> and mmci_dma_finalize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> index 696a066..f1ec066 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> @@ -332,9 +332,7 @@ struct mmci_host {
>         struct mmci_host_next   next_data;
>         bool                    dma_in_progress;
>
> -#define dma_inprogress(host)   ((host)->dma_in_progress)
> -#else
> -#define dma_inprogress(host)   (0)
> +#define __dma_inprogress(host) ((host)->dma_in_progress)

Please keep the existing function name.

If there are good reasons to change it, please make it a part of a
change where it makes sense.

>  #endif
>  };
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Besides the nitpick above, this looks good to me!

Kind regards
Uffe