linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:34:15 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>
Cc:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
        paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kishon@...com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing
 configuration

> I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
> net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.

Hi Quentin

Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.

     Andrew