[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180903165257.29227-3-dima@arista.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 17:52:55 +0100
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Nathan March <nathan@...net>,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
syzbot+3aa9784721dfb90e984d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/4] tty: Hold tty_ldisc_lock() during tty_reopen()
tty_ldisc_reinit() doesn't race with neither tty_ldisc_hangup()
nor set_ldisc() nor tty_ldisc_release() as they use tty lock.
But it races with anyone who expects line discipline to be the same
after hoding read semaphore in tty_ldisc_ref().
We've seen the following crash on v4.9.108 stable:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000002260
IP: [..] n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x5f/0x86d
Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
[..] n_tty_receive_buf2
[..] tty_ldisc_receive_buf
[..] flush_to_ldisc
[..] process_one_work
[..] worker_thread
[..] kthread
[..] ret_from_fork
tty_ldisc_reinit() should be called with ldisc_sem hold for writing,
which will protect any reader against line discipline changes.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # depends on commit b027e2298bd5 ("tty: fix
data race between tty_init_dev and flush of buf")
Reported-by: syzbot+3aa9784721dfb90e984d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 5e5da9acaf0a..a947719b4626 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static void tty_driver_remove_tty(struct tty_driver *driver, struct tty_struct *
static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct tty_driver *driver = tty->driver;
- int retval;
+ int retval = 0;
if (driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
@@ -1267,15 +1267,18 @@ static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
if (test_bit(TTY_EXCLUSIVE, &tty->flags) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EBUSY;
- tty->count++;
+ tty_ldisc_lock(tty, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ tty->count++;
if (tty->ldisc)
- return 0;
+ goto out_unlock;
retval = tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, tty->termios.c_line);
if (retval)
tty->count--;
+out_unlock:
+ tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
return retval;
}
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists