[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf3310b2-dad4-63a3-f420-417d430f0a98@daenzer.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:01:55 +0200
From: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm: fix drm_mode_addfb() on big endian machines.
On 2018-09-03 6:45 p.m., Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Userspace on big endian machhines typically expects the ADDFB ioctl
>> returns a big endian framebuffer. drm_mode_addfb() will call
>> drm_mode_addfb2() unconditionally with little endian DRM_FORMAT_*
>> values though, which is wrong. This patch fixes that.
>>
>> Drivers (both kernel and xorg) have quirks in place to deal with the
>> broken drm_mode_addfb() behavior. Because of this we can't just change
>> drm_mode_addfb() behavior for everybody without breaking things. So add
>> a new driver feature flag DRIVER_PREFER_HOST_BYTE_ORDER, so drivers can
>> opt-in.
Since the changes are opt-in now, they shouldn't affect drivers which
don't opt in; they should work as well (or as badly :) after these
changes as they did before. So no concerns from my side anymore.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists