[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180903165638.133424672@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:55:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 017/107] net: caif: Add a missing rcu_read_unlock() in caif_flow_cb
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 64119e05f7b31e83e2555f6782e6cdc8f81c63f4 ]
Add a missing rcu_read_unlock in the error path
Fixes: c95567c80352 ("caif: added check for potential null return")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/caif/caif_dev.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/caif/caif_dev.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_dev.c
@@ -131,8 +131,10 @@ static void caif_flow_cb(struct sk_buff
caifd = caif_get(skb->dev);
WARN_ON(caifd == NULL);
- if (caifd == NULL)
+ if (!caifd) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return;
+ }
caifd_hold(caifd);
rcu_read_unlock();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists