[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180903165639.969457894@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:56:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 055/107] smb3: Do not send SMB3 SET_INFO if nothing changed
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
commit fd09b7d3b352105f08b8e02f7afecf7e816380ef upstream.
An earlier commit had a typo which prevented the
optimization from working:
commit 18dd8e1a65dd ("Do not send SMB3 SET_INFO request if nothing is changing")
Thank you to Metze for noticing this. Also clear a
reserved field in the FILE_BASIC_INFO struct we send
that should be zero (all the other fields in that
struct were set or cleared explicitly already in
cifs_set_file_info).
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
CC: Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.9.x+
Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cifs/inode.c | 2 ++
fs/cifs/smb2inode.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -1116,6 +1116,8 @@ cifs_set_file_info(struct inode *inode,
if (!server->ops->set_file_info)
return -ENOSYS;
+ info_buf.Pad = 0;
+
if (attrs->ia_valid & ATTR_ATIME) {
set_time = true;
info_buf.LastAccessTime =
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2inode.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ smb2_set_file_info(struct inode *inode,
int rc;
if ((buf->CreationTime == 0) && (buf->LastAccessTime == 0) &&
- (buf->LastWriteTime == 0) && (buf->ChangeTime) &&
+ (buf->LastWriteTime == 0) && (buf->ChangeTime == 0) &&
(buf->Attributes == 0))
return 0; /* would be a no op, no sense sending this */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists