linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH crypto-2.6] crypto: ccp: add timeout support in the SEV command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180904081151.GC32615@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 4 Sep 2018 10:11:51 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        Gary Hook <Gary.Hook@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH crypto-2.6] crypto: ccp: add timeout support in the SEV
 command

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 04:11:25PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Currently, the CCP driver assumes that the SEV command issued to the PSP
> will always return (i.e. it will never hang).  But recently, firmware bugs
> have shown that a command can hang.  Since of the SEV commands are used
> in probe routines, this can cause boot hangs and/or loss of virtualization
> capabilities.
> 
> To protect against firmware bugs, add a timeout in the SEV command
> execution flow.  If a command does not complete within the specified
> timeout then return -ETIMEOUT and stop the driver from executing any
> further commands since the state of the SEV firmware is unknown.
> 
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Cc: Gary Hook <Gary.Hook@....com>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c
> index 218739b..72790d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,17 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(sev_cmd_mutex);
>  static struct sev_misc_dev *misc_dev;
>  static struct psp_device *psp_master;
>  
> +static int psp_cmd_timeout = 100;
> +module_param(psp_cmd_timeout, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(psp_cmd_timeout, " default timeout value, in seconds, for PSP commands");
> +
> +static int psp_probe_timeout = 5;
> +module_param(psp_probe_timeout, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(psp_probe_timeout, " default timeout value, in seconds, during PSP device probe");

Just a question: what prevents the user from supplying non-sensical
values here?

I think we should clamp them to only allowed values because I don't want
to be debugging some strange bugs due to that.

> +
> +static bool psp_dead;
> +static int psp_timeout;
> +
>  static struct psp_device *psp_alloc_struct(struct sp_device *sp)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = sp->dev;
> @@ -82,10 +93,19 @@ static irqreturn_t psp_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static void sev_wait_cmd_ioc(struct psp_device *psp, unsigned int *reg)
> +static int sev_wait_cmd_ioc(struct psp_device *psp,
> +			    unsigned int *reg, unsigned int timeout)
>  {
> -	wait_event(psp->sev_int_queue, psp->sev_int_rcvd);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = wait_event_timeout(psp->sev_int_queue,
> +			psp->sev_int_rcvd, timeout * HZ);

Align args at opening brace.

> +	if (!ret)
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
>  	*reg = ioread32(psp->io_regs + psp->vdata->cmdresp_reg);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int sev_cmd_buffer_len(int cmd)
> @@ -133,12 +153,15 @@ static int __sev_do_cmd_locked(int cmd, void *data, int *psp_ret)
>  	if (!psp)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (psp_dead)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
>  	/* Get the physical address of the command buffer */
>  	phys_lsb = data ? lower_32_bits(__psp_pa(data)) : 0;
>  	phys_msb = data ? upper_32_bits(__psp_pa(data)) : 0;
>  
> -	dev_dbg(psp->dev, "sev command id %#x buffer 0x%08x%08x\n",
> -		cmd, phys_msb, phys_lsb);
> +	dev_dbg(psp->dev, "sev command id %#x buffer 0x%08x%08x timeout %us\n",
> +		cmd, phys_msb, phys_lsb, psp_timeout);
>  
>  	print_hex_dump_debug("(in):  ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 2, data,
>  			     sev_cmd_buffer_len(cmd), false);
> @@ -154,7 +177,18 @@ static int __sev_do_cmd_locked(int cmd, void *data, int *psp_ret)
>  	iowrite32(reg, psp->io_regs + psp->vdata->cmdresp_reg);
>  
>  	/* wait for command completion */
> -	sev_wait_cmd_ioc(psp, &reg);
> +	ret = sev_wait_cmd_ioc(psp, &reg, psp_timeout);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (psp_ret)
> +			*psp_ret = 0;
> +
> +		dev_err(psp->dev, "sev command %#x timed out, disabling PSP \n", cmd);
									   ^

Trailing space.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.