lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Sep 2018 12:43:19 +0300
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To:     jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>, hverkuil@...all.nl,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, dalias@...c.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh

On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:33:58AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi again Sakari,
>    sorry, I'm confusing you
> 
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Jacopo,
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >     this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based
> > > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one
> > > > sensor driver used by one of those boards.
> > > >
> > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know
> > > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework.
> > >
> > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU
> > > driver is the last using SoC camera framework.
> > >
> 
> The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in
> v4.19-rc2.

Oh; I missed this entirely. I thought it'd be merge later as there were
comments. Anyway it's good it's in. :-)

> 
> Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one
> removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323

Given this series is in the current Linus's tree, that seems like a
no-brainer now.

> 
> Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's
> probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far,
> I haven't heard from them.
> 
> I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send.

If you have further changes, please make them in separate patches.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists