[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180904141724.GJ24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 16:17:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf tool improvement requests
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Then I need to get the DW_AT_location stuff parsed in pahole, so
> that with those offsets (second column, ending with :) with hits (first
> column, there its local period, but we can ask for some specific metric
> [1]), I'll be able to figure out what DW_TAG_variable or
> DW_TAG_formal_parameter is living there at that time, get the offset
> from the decoded instruction, say that xor, 0x138 offset from the type
> for %r15 at that offset (85) from kmem_cache_alloc, right?
I'm not sure how the DWARF location stuff works; it could be it already
includes the offset and decoding the instruction is not needed.
But yes, that's the basic idea; get DWARF to tell you what variable is
used at a certain IP.
> In a first milestone we'd have something like:
>
> perf annotate --hits function | pahole --annotate -C task_struct
>
> perf annotate --hits | pahole --annotate
Not sure keeping it two proglets makes sense, but whatever :-)
The alternative I suppose is making perf do the IP->struct::member
mapping and freed that to pahole, which then only uses it to annotate
the output.
Or, munge the entirety of pahole into perf..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists