[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5548f5d-59df-f38e-255d-59b46a17a219@deltatee.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:47:07 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/13] nvme-pci: Add support for P2P memory in requests
On 04/09/18 09:16 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> if (iod->nents) {
>> - dma_unmap_sg(dev->dev, iod->sg, iod->nents, dma_dir);
>> + /* P2PDMA requests do not need to be unmapped */
>> + if (!is_pci_p2pdma_page(sg_page(iod->sg)))
>> + dma_unmap_sg(dev->dev, iod->sg, iod->nents, dma_dir);
>
> This seems like a poor direction, if we add IOMMU hairpin support we
> will need unmapping.
It can always be added later. In any case, you'll have to convince
Christoph who requested the change; I'm not that invested in this decision.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists