[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeC0n82thqKKywfiTwd7_fngrc5Zf_1dMzmNdjgafgMvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 21:01:15 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
serge.ayoun@...el.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/13] x86/sgx: Add data structures for tracking the
EPC pages
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 a> +/**
> > > + va = ioremap_cache(addr, size);
> > > + if (!va)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > I'm not sure this is a right API. Do we operate with memory? Does it
> > have I/O side effects?
> > If no, memremap() would be better to use.
>
> Preserving __iomem is desirable. There aren't side effects per se,
> but direct non-enclave accesses to the EPC get abort page semantics so
> the kernel shouldn't be directly dereferencing a pointer to the EPC.
> Though by that argument, sgx_epc_bank.va, sgx_epc_addr's return and
> all ENCLS helpers should be tagged __iomem.
Why?
Does it related to *any* I/O?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists