linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] RISC-V: Use Linux logical cpu number instead of hartid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180904213654.GB2078@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:36:54 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "damein@...r.kernel.org" <damein@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] RISC-V: Use Linux logical cpu number instead of
 hartid

On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 01:35:10PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> sure. How about this ?

That would work, but why not just keep calling sbi_remove_sfence_vma
directly from flush_tlb_all?