[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561f2078-92e8-290f-626c-ff936b7285c1@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:49:00 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...ian.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: onenand: fix parameter list build warning
On 09/04/2018 02:34 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote on Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:32:04
> -0700:
>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>
>> Fix build warning in <linux/mtd/onenand.h> by adding a "stub" struct
>> for mtd_oob_ops:
>>
>> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h: warning: 'struct mtd_oob_ops' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
>>
>> Fixes: 607d1cb10426 ("[MTD] [OneNAND] proper onenand_bbt_read_oob() prototype")
>>
>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>> Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
>> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
>> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...ian.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> --- lnx-419-rc2.orig/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
>> +++ lnx-419-rc2/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
>> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ struct onenand_manufacturers {
>> char *name;
>> };
>>
>> +struct mtd_oob_ops;
>> int onenand_bbt_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
>> struct mtd_oob_ops *ops);
>> unsigned onenand_block(struct onenand_chip *this, loff_t addr);
>
> That's indeed a working solution, but there are a lot of other
> structures in this file that come (like mtd_oob_ops) from
> linux/mtd/mtd.h so I wonder if it would not make more sense to include
> this header here?
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Hi,
Have you see this from Linus?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFzMBptQt-QHMR0MM9MA3=1rxcf8ca5qHxrf4Mm0ZobE_A@mail.gmail.com/
thanks,
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists