[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180905060445.15008-4-kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:04:42 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: michel@...nzer.net, imirkin@...m.mit.edu,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] drm: do not mask out DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN
framebuffer_check() expects that drm_get_format_info() will not fail if
the __drm_format_info() call was successful. That'll work only in case
both are called with the same pixel_format value, so masking out the
DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN flag isn't a good idea.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
index 17b7b8944d..888c4d53cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev,
int i;
/* check if the format is supported at all */
- info = __drm_format_info(r->pixel_format & ~DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN);
+ info = __drm_format_info(r->pixel_format);
if (!info) {
struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists