lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051002020.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/boot: Add bit fields into xloadflags for 5-level
 kernel checking

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> On 09/04/18 01:42, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > 
> > Switching between 4- and 5-level paging modes (in either direction)
> > requires paing disabling. It means the code that does the switching has to
> > be under 4G otherwise we would lose control.
> > 
> > We handle the switching correctly in kernel decompression code, but not on
> > kexec caller side.
> > 
> > XLF_5LEVEL indicates that kernel decompression code can deal with
> > switching between paging modes and it's safe to jump there in 5-level
> > paging mode.
> > 
> > As an alternative we can change kexec to switch to 4-level paging mode
> > before starting the new kernel. Not sure how hard it will be.
> > 
> 
> Have a flag saying entering in 5-level mode is fine.  However, you really
> should support returning to 4-level mode in kexec.  It is *much* easier to do
> on the caller side as you have total control of memory allocation there.

Works for a regular kexec, but not for starting a crash kernel....

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ