[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905082131.GV28861@localhost>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:21:31 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Karoly Pados <pados@...os.hu>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, ajaykuee@...il.com,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi_sio: implement GPIO support for FT230X
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 06:07:49PM +0000, Karoly Pados wrote:
> >>> + priv->gc.ngpio = 4;
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be handled the other way round? IIRC there are two FTX
> >> device types with four pins, and one type where only one pin is
> >> accessible.
> >
> > There are 4 devices with 1 GPIO, 1 device with 2 GPIOs, 2 devices with 4 GPIOs,
> > and 1 device with 6 GPIOs. Source: http://www.ftdichip.com/FT-X.htm (2nd table)
> > Do you still want me turn this over?
> >
>
> Aaah, but those other devices are not UART bridges. I see what you mean now.
> The point for me when developing th original patch
The last sentence looks incomplete; did you hit send too soon or too
late? ;)
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists