[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905084746.xmckzskxzsdliz3e@wunner.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:47:46 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thunderbolt: Initialize after IOMMUs
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 04:20:12PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> If IOMMU is enabled and Thunderbolt driver is built into the kernel
> image, it will be probed before IOMMUs are attached to the PCI bus.
> Because of this DMA mappings the driver does will not go through IOMMU
> and start failing right after IOMMUs are enabled.
>
> For this reason move the Thunderbolt driver initialization happen at
> rootfs level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> index 88cff05a1808..5cd6bdfa068f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> @@ -1191,5 +1191,5 @@ static void __exit nhi_unload(void)
> tb_domain_exit();
> }
>
> -fs_initcall(nhi_init);
> +rootfs_initcall(nhi_init);
> module_exit(nhi_unload);
What if the rootfs is located on a Thunderbolt-attached drive and
the thunderbolt driver needs to establish tunnels to that drive
before rootfs can be accessed? Doesn't the above break such a setup?
I think the dependency on the IOMMU should be open coded by returning
-EPROBE_DEFER from the ->probe hook if it's not yet attached.
Shuffling around initcall order is just applying duct tape.
Commit acb40d841257 already changed module_init() to fs_initcall()
and now it has to be changed again. Shows how fragile this is.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists