linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Fix two more xxx_config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:12:15 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: Fix two more xxx_config_get() functions
 to be compliant

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:24 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> I have no way to test the patches in this series, but Stephen Boyd
> pointed out the problems being fixed here when he reviewed my patch
> ("pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Fix pmic_gpio_config_get() to be
> compliant").  It seemed nice to (finally) follow-up and address the
> problems that Stephen found.  Hopefully someone can test them out and
> make sure they work as advertised.

Both patches applied with the review tags.

If people don't test RFT patches, then maybe they will test
linux-next.

So applied to devel for now.

Yours,
Linus Walleij