lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905023522.GA1444@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:35:22 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages
 check loglevel when flushing the buffer

Hi,

On (09/04/18 20:01), Hans de Goede wrote:
> Commit 375899cddcbb ("printk: make sure to print log on console."), moved
> the checking of the loglevel of messages from flush time to the actual
> log time.
> 
> This introduces one problem, some early boot messages are printed before
> parse_early_param() gets called and thus before kernel commandline options
> such as quiet, loglevel and ignore_loglevel are parsed.

Do you use earlycon?

> This causes e.g. the following messages to get printed on x86 systems,
> despite the presence of the "quiet" option:
> 
> [    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> [    0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000057fff] usable
> ...
> [    0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000000874ffffff] usable
> 
> This commit fixes this by setting a new LOG_CHK_LEVEL on early boot
> messages and doing the loglevel check for these while flushing as before.
> 

Hmm, OK, chances are we need to re-think 375899cddcbb. It might be
the case that we sort of broke CON_PRINTBUFFER handling.

	console_loglevel = CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_MOTORMOUTH
	register CON_PRINTBUFFER console
		-> no debug output

So I think that when console_unlock() re-flushes already seen logbuf
messages to a newly registered exclusive [CON_PRINTBUFFER] console we
probably need to look at the current console_loglevel in console_unlock()
loop.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ