[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905135019.56b303da.olaf@aepfle.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 13:50:19 +0200
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xen: avoid crash in disable_hotplug_cpu
Am Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:55:58 +0200
schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>:
> the last cpu
Which one is the "last" one? I mean, if cpu#0 never can be offlined than perhaps the code should check for just that and return early. But if cpu#0 could be disabled while some other cpu is the remaining cpu, some other check is needed I think.
Olaf
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists