[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <582c17b3-5d52-24c0-8d95-af3d62071738@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 07:28:34 -0500
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To: cgxu519 <cgxu519@....com>
Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH v2 4/5] jfs: cache NULL when both
default_acl and acl are NULL
On 9/5/18 1:13 AM, cgxu519 wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2018 04:34 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> Are you pushing these as a series, or would you like this patch pushed
>> through the jfs tree?
> I'd hope maintainers pick individual patch to their tree.
I'll take care of this one.
Thanks,
Shaggy
>
> Thanks,
> Chengguang
>
>>
>> On 8/31/18 9:33 AM, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>>> default_acl and acl of newly created inode will be initiated
>>> as ACL_NOT_CACHED in vfs function inode_init_always() and later
>>> will be updated by calling xxx_init_acl() in specific filesystems.
>>> Howerver, when default_acl and acl are NULL then they keep the value
>>> of ACL_NOT_CACHED, this patch tries to cache NULL for acl/default_acl
>>> in this case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@....com>
>> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists