[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1536158083-30166-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:34:41 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux@...inikbrodowski.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
oleg@...hat.com, steve.mcintyre@....com, dave.martin@....com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Don't use SIGMINSTKSZ when enforcing alternative signal stack size for compat tasks
Hi all,
This is a resend of:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-July/593559.html
now based on 4.19-rc2.
The Debian folks have observed a failure in the 32-bit arm glibc testsuite
when running under a 64-bit kernel. They tracked this down to sigaltstack(2)
enforcing the alternative signal stack to be at least SIGMINSTKSZ bytes,
which is higher for native arm64 tasks than compat 32-bit tasks.
These patches resolve the issue by allowing an architecture to define
COMPAT_SIGMINSTKSZ for compat tasks, which is then used by the sigaltstack
checking code.
Feedback welcome,
Will
--->8
Will Deacon (2):
signal: Introduce COMPAT_SIGMINSTKSZ for use in compat_sys_sigaltstack
arm64: compat: Provide definition for COMPAT_SIGMINSTKSZ
arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h | 1 +
include/linux/compat.h | 3 +++
kernel/signal.c | 14 +++++++++-----
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists