[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180905150546.GK4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:05:46 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add back in rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for
rcuidle tracepoints
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:26:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 05:59:41 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:22:54AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 01:53:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > I must defer to Borislav on this one. Assuming it has the desired
> > > > effect, I am good with it.
> > >
> > > It did survive a bunch of reboots (the WARN would fire after boot
> > > finishes, normally) so I guess we can run with it and see how it works
> > > out in the next couple of weeks.
> > >
> > > Thanks guys!
> >
> > Woo-hoo!!! Thank you for testing this!
> >
>
> Here's the official patch if you want to add an Ack/review/tested-by:
>
> -- Steve
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Borislav reported the following splat:
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 4.19.0-rc1+ #1 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:631 rcu_read_lock() used illegally while idle!
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
> 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
> #0: 000000004557ee0e (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: perf_event_output_forward+0x0/0x130
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc1+ #1
> Hardware name: LENOVO 2320CTO/2320CTO, BIOS G2ET86WW (2.06 ) 11/13/2012
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x85/0xcb
> perf_event_output_forward+0xf6/0x130
> __perf_event_overflow+0x52/0xe0
> perf_swevent_overflow+0x91/0xb0
> perf_tp_event+0x11a/0x350
> ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
> ? __lock_acquire+0x2ce/0x1350
> ? __lock_acquire+0x2ce/0x1350
> ? retint_kernel+0x2d/0x2d
> ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
> ? tick_nohz_get_sleep_length+0x83/0xb0
> ? perf_trace_cpu+0xbb/0xd0
> ? perf_trace_buf_alloc+0x5a/0xa0
> perf_trace_cpu+0xbb/0xd0
> cpuidle_enter_state+0x185/0x340
> do_idle+0x1eb/0x260
> cpu_startup_entry+0x5f/0x70
> start_kernel+0x49b/0x4a6
> secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
>
> This is due to the tracepoints moving to SRCU usage which does not require
> RCU to be "watching". But perf uses these tracepoints with RCU and expects
> it to be. Hence, we still need to add in the rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson()
> calls for "rcuidle" tracepoints. This is a temporary fix until we have SRCU
> working in NMI context, and then perf can be converted to use that instead
> of normal RCU.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180904162611.6a120068@gandalf.local.home
>
> Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Fixes: e6753f23d961d ("tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index 7f2e16e76ac4..041f7e56a289 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -158,8 +158,10 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \
> * doesn't work from the idle path. \
> */ \
> - if (rcuidle) \
> + if (rcuidle) { \
> idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \
> + rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \
> + } \
> \
> it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_raw((tp)->funcs); \
> \
> @@ -171,8 +173,10 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \
> } \
> \
> - if (rcuidle) \
> + if (rcuidle) { \
> + rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \
> srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\
> + } \
> \
> preempt_enable_notrace(); \
> } while (0)
> --
> 2.13.6
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists