[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905155317.GA20320@u40b0340c692b58f6553c.ant.amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:53:17 -0700
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"Jia Zhang" <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] perf/x86/intel: make error messages less confusing
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:52:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On a system with X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON disabled
> > and with a model not known by family PMU drivers,
> > user gets a kernel message log like the following:
> > [ 0.100114] Performance Events: unsupported p6 CPU model 85 no PMU driver, software events only.
> >
> > The "unsupported .. CPU" part may be confusing for some
> > users leading to wrong understanding that the kernel
> > does not support the CPU model.
>
> Send them back to first grade, such that they might learn to read?
>
:-)
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists