[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1536172759.3024.44.camel@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 19:39:19 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@...el.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 026/124] iwlwifi: pcie: fix race in Rx buffer
allocator
On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 11:00 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@...el.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 0f22e40053bd5378ad1e3250e65c574fd61c0cd6 ]
>
> Make sure the rx_allocator worker is canceled before running the
> rx_init routine. rx_init frees and re-allocates all rxb's pages. The
> rx_allocator worker also allocates pages for the used rxb's. Running
> rx_init and rx_allocator simultaniously causes a kernel panic. Fix
> that by canceling the work in rx_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c
> @@ -713,6 +713,8 @@ int iwl_pcie_rx_init(struct iwl_trans *t
> WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
> INIT_WORK(&rba->rx_alloc, iwl_pcie_rx_allocator_work);
>
> + cancel_work_sync(&rba->rx_alloc);
> +
> spin_lock(&rba->lock);
> atomic_set(&rba->req_pending, 0);
> atomic_set(&rba->req_ready, 0);
This seems to be an incomplete fix. INIT_WORK() will overwrite the
list pointers in the work item, so there is still a race condition.
I think that the RX initialisation and reinitialisation/reset cases
need to be explicitly distinguished. In the initialisation case the
driver should do only INIT_WORK() and in the reset case it should do
only cancel_work_sync() (although it would be safe to do INIT_WORK()
*after* that).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd
https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists