linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 52/66] Revert "perf tests: Decompress kernel module before objdump"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:50:02 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@...il.com>,
        Lei Chen <chenl.lei@...il.com>,
        Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, kernel-team@....com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 52/66] Revert "perf tests: Decompress kernel module
 before objdump"

On 04/17/2018 08:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> This reverts commit 7525a238be8f46617cdda29d1be5b85ffe3b042d which is
> commit 94df1040b1e6aacd8dec0ba3c61d7e77cd695f26 upstream.
> 
> It breaks the build of perf on 4.9.y, so I'm dropping it.

Sorry to hijack this thread, I was not able to find the original email
when the offending patch was included in 4.1.52. So kernel 4.1.52 also
has the same problem, can you push a 4.1.53 tag with that patch reverted
as well?

Thank you!

> 
> Reported-by: Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Lei Chen <chenl.lei@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinlian@...il.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> Cc: kernel-team@....com
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c |   20 +-------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> @@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ static int read_object_code(u64 addr, si
>  	unsigned char buf2[BUFSZ];
>  	size_t ret_len;
>  	u64 objdump_addr;
> -	const char *objdump_name;
> -	char decomp_name[KMOD_DECOMP_LEN];
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	pr_debug("Reading object code for memory address: %#"PRIx64"\n", addr);
> @@ -286,25 +284,9 @@ static int read_object_code(u64 addr, si
>  		state->done[state->done_cnt++] = al.map->start;
>  	}
>  
> -	objdump_name = al.map->dso->long_name;
> -	if (dso__needs_decompress(al.map->dso)) {
> -		if (dso__decompress_kmodule_path(al.map->dso, objdump_name,
> -						 decomp_name,
> -						 sizeof(decomp_name)) < 0) {
> -			pr_debug("decompression failed\n");
> -			return -1;
> -		}
> -
> -		objdump_name = decomp_name;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Read the object code using objdump */
>  	objdump_addr = map__rip_2objdump(al.map, al.addr);
> -	ret = read_via_objdump(objdump_name, objdump_addr, buf2, len);
> -
> -	if (dso__needs_decompress(al.map->dso))
> -		unlink(objdump_name);
> -
> +	ret = read_via_objdump(al.map->dso->long_name, objdump_addr, buf2, len);
>  	if (ret > 0) {
>  		/*
>  		 * The kernel maps are inaccurate - assume objdump is right in
> 
> 


-- 
Florian