[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905185617.GC24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:56:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/alternatives: text_poke() fixes
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 10:32:18AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> This patch-set addresses some issues that were raised in a recent
> correspondence and might affect the security and the correctness of code
> patching. (Note that patching performance is not addressed by this
> patch-set).
>
> The main issue that the patches deal with is the fact that the fixmap
> PTEs that are used for patching are available for access from other
> cores and might be exploited. They are not even flushed from the TLB in
> remote cores, so the risk is even higher. Address this issue by
> introducing a temporary mm that is only used during patching.
> Unfortunately, due to init ordering, fixmap is still used during
> boot-time patching. Future patches can eliminate the need for it.
>
Remind me; why are we doing it like this instead of fixing fixmap?
Because while this fixes the text_poke crud, it does leave fixmap
broken.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists