[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqt6zaeOzrzMCqtnv=3gF4+K9HGtbB0C7bOeE+6YmBvvxBaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 00:37:06 +0530
From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: syzbot+87a05ae4accd500f5242@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
mawilcox@...rosoft.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
zwisler@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next test error
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:25 PM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On Wed 05-09-18 00:13:02, syzbot wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > syzbot found the following crash on:
> >
> > HEAD commit: 387ac6229ecf Add linux-next specific files for 20180905
> > git tree: linux-next
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=149c67a6400000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ad5163873ecfbc32
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87a05ae4accd500f5242
> > compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> >
> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > Reported-by: syzbot+87a05ae4accd500f5242@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >
> > INFO: task hung in do_page_mkwriteINFO: task syz-fuzzer:4876 blocked for
> > more than 140 seconds.
> > Not tainted 4.19.0-rc2-next-20180905+ #56
> > "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > syz-fuzzer D21704 4876 4871 0x00000000
> > Call Trace:
> > context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:2825 [inline]
> > __schedule+0x87c/0x1df0 kernel/sched/core.c:3473
> > schedule+0xfb/0x450 kernel/sched/core.c:3517
> > io_schedule+0x1c/0x70 kernel/sched/core.c:5140
> > wait_on_page_bit_common mm/filemap.c:1100 [inline]
> > __lock_page+0x5b7/0x7a0 mm/filemap.c:1273
> > lock_page include/linux/pagemap.h:483 [inline]
> > do_page_mkwrite+0x429/0x520 mm/memory.c:2391
>
> Waiting for page lock after ->page_mkwrite callback. Which means
> ->page_mkwrite did not return VM_FAULT_LOCKED but 0. Looking into
> linux-next... indeed "fs: convert return type int to vm_fault_t" has busted
> block_page_mkwrite(). It has to return VM_FAULT_LOCKED and not 0 now.
> Souptick, can I ask you to run 'fstests' for at least common filesystems
> like ext4, xfs, btrfs when you change generic filesystem code please? That
> would catch a bug like this immediately. Thanks.
Looking into existing code block_page_mkwrite() returns 0, not VM_FAULT_LOCKED
in true path and this patch doesn't change any existing behaviour of
block_page_mkwrite()
except adding one new input parameter to return err value to caller function.
-int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+vm_fault_t ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+ err = 0;
+ ret = block_page_mkwrite(vma, vmf, get_block, &err);
if (!ret && ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
if (ext4_walk_page_buffers(handle, page_buffers(page), 0,
PAGE_SIZE, NULL, do_journal_get_write_access)) {
unlock_page(page);
- ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
I think, this part has created problem where page_mkwrite()
end up with returning 0.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists