[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcc1b3cf-2fd9-fa61-9cfb-b0e4d84e5d94@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 13:54:31 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and
check support for requests
On 9/5/18 1:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:45:04PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> The point is that the caller doesn't necessarily know where the bio
>> will end up, hence the caller can't fully check if the whole stack
>> supports P2P.
>
> The caller must necessarily know where the bio will end up, as for P2P
> support we need to query if the bio target is P2P capable vs the
> source of the P2P memory.
Then what's the point of having the check at all?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists