[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3af4d1d4-da07-c0a6-8464-9ddc1378f2f4@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:19:39 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and
check support for requests
On 9/5/18 2:18 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/18 02:14 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> But if the caller must absolutely know where the bio will end up, then
>> it seems super redundant. So I'd vote for killing this check, it buys
>> us absolutely nothing and isn't even exhaustive in its current form.
>
>
> Ok, I'll remove it for v6.
Since the drivers needs to know it's doing it right, it might not
hurt to add a sanity check helper for that. Just have the driver
call it, and don't add it in the normal IO submission path.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists