linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the backing device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180906221929.GZ26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:19:29 +0200
From:   Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr>
To:     Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the
 backing device

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:29:32PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:28:01PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:35:15PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > > AFAICT, this will cause the backend to never switch to 'Closed' state
> > > > until the toolstack sets online to 0, which is not good IMO.
> > > > 
> > > > If for example a frontend decides to close a device, the backend will
> > > > stay in state 'Closing' until the toolstack actually removes the disk
> > > > by setting online to 0.
> > > > 
> > > > This will prevent resetting blk connections, as blkback will refuse to
> > > > switch to state XenbusStateInitWait unless it's at XenbusStateClosed
> > > > (see the XenbusStateInitialising case in frontend_changed), which will
> > > > never be reached with your patch.
> > 
> > Would it be possible to call xen_vbd_free before the state change?
> > 
> >         case XenbusStateClosed:
> >                 xen_blkif_disconnect(be->blkif);
> >                 xen_vbd_free(&be->blkif->vbd);
> >                 xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
> 
> I think that will break reconnection, since xen_vbd_create is only
> called after hotplug script execution is performed (which happens only
> once at device attachment), but not when DomU changes frontend
> state.
> 
> If you want to perform this xen_vbd_free you will also have to move
> the xen_vbd_create call AFAICT, to a place that's also called when
> reconnecting a device. Note that I could be wrong, so it might be
> worth a shot to try different approaches since the blkback code is
> quite tangled and I might miss something.

It seems like the Closed state is not a good point to call the remove
script since the device could go back from Closed to Connected.

Maybe it would help to introduce a new final state (7 = XenbusStateFree
or XenbusStateRemove) that would be set after xen_vbd_free to let the
userspace know it is safe to run the remove script?

static void xen_blkif_free(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
{

        WARN_ON(xen_blkif_disconnect(blkif));
        xen_vbd_free(&blkif->vbd);
        xenbus_switch_state(blkif->be->dev, XenbusStateFree);
        kfree(blkif->be->mode);
        kfree(blkif->be);

        /* Make sure everything is drained before shutting down */
        kmem_cache_free(xen_blkif_cachep, blkif);
}

-- 
Valentin