linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/14] PM / EM: Expose the Energy Model in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 23:56:43 -0700
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
        patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net,
        javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/14] PM / EM: Expose the Energy Model in sysfs

On 08/20/2018 02:44 AM, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Expose the Energy Model (read-only) of all performance domains in sysfs
> for convenience. To do so, add a kobject to the CPU subsystem under the
> umbrella of which a kobject for each performance domain is attached.
> 
> The resulting hierarchy is as follows for a platform with two
> performance domains for example:
> 
>     /sys/devices/system/cpu/energy_model
>     ├── pd0
>     │   ├── cost
>     │   ├── cpus
>     │   ├── frequency
>     │   └── power

cpus (cpumask of the perf domain), frequency (OPP's of the perf domain) 
and power (values at those OPP's) are somehow easy to grasp, cost is 
definitely not.

You have this nice description in em_pd_energy() what cost actually is. 
IMHO, might be worth repeating this at least in the patch header here.

[...]