linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180906083149.GZ14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:31:49 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation.

On Thu 06-09-18 09:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep
> 
> ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> 	obj-y		+= nobootmem.o
> else
> 	obj-y		+= bootmem.o
> endif
> 
> behind?

I can see you have done so in an earlier patch. I have missed that.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs