linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] arm/arm64: dts: msm8974/msm8916: thermal: Split address space into two

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:54:16 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        smohanad@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, mka@...omium.org,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] arm/arm64: dts: msm8974/msm8916: thermal: Split
 address space into two

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:29 AM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue 28 Aug 06:38 PDT 2018, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
> > We've earlier added support to split the register address space into TM
> > and SROT regions.
> >
> > Split up the regmap address space into two for the remaining platforms
> > that have a similar register layout and make corresponding changes to
> > the get_temp_common() function used by these platforms.
> >
> > Since tsens-common.c/init_common() currently only registers one address
> > space, the order is important (TM before SROT).  This is OK since the
> > code doesn't really use the SROT functionality yet.
> >
>
> Having a single patch touching both code and dts will cause merge issues
> as this patch travel upstream. Even more arm-soc expects arm and arm64
> dts changes to come in different pull requests.


> Please split it so that the three pieces can be picked up by respective
> maintainer.

Will do.

> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi   | 5 +++--
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 5 +++--
> >  drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c   | 5 +++--
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> > index d9019a49b292..56dbbf788d15 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> > @@ -427,9 +427,10 @@
> >                       };
> >               };
> >
> > -             tsens: thermal-sensor@...a8000 {
> > +             tsens: thermal-sensor@...a9000 {
> >                       compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens";
> > -                     reg = <0xfc4a8000 0x2000>;
> > +                     reg = <0xfc4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
> > +                           <0xfc4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
> >                       nvmem-cells = <&tsens_calib>, <&tsens_backup>;
> >                       nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_backup";
> >                       #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> > index 7b32b8990d62..6a277fce3333 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> > @@ -761,9 +761,10 @@
> >                       };
> >               };
> >
> > -             tsens: thermal-sensor@...000 {
> > +             tsens: thermal-sensor@...000 {
> >                       compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens";
> > -                     reg = <0x4a8000 0x2000>;
> > +                     reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
> > +                           <0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
> >                       nvmem-cells = <&tsens_caldata>, <&tsens_calsel>;
> >                       nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_sel";
> >                       #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index 6207d8d92351..478739543bbc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include "tsens.h"
> >
> > -#define S0_ST_ADDR           0x1030
> > +#define STATUS_OFFSET                0x30
> >  #define SN_ADDR_OFFSET               0x4
> >  #define SN_ST_TEMP_MASK              0x3ff
> >  #define CAL_DEGC_PT1         30
> > @@ -107,8 +107,9 @@ int get_temp_common(struct tsens_device *tmdev, int id, int *temp)
> >       unsigned int status_reg;
> >       int last_temp = 0, ret;
> >
> > -     status_reg = S0_ST_ADDR + s->hw_id * SN_ADDR_OFFSET;
> > +     status_reg = tmdev->tm_offset + STATUS_OFFSET + s->hw_id * SN_ADDR_OFFSET;
>
> Wasn't this change part of the previous set that introduced the
> tm_offset? If not how did we handle the fact that tmdev->map is already
> indented 0x1000 bytes?

It was a similar change 5b1283984fa3 ("thermal: tsens: Add support to
split up register address space into two") for the get_temp_8996()
function.

This patch converts over the remaining users.

> Both changes looks good, but I'm worries about the order of things.

We're OK.