linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: platform/chrome: some more cleanups between these subsystems.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLzEks7FX81Ay1bC3zkWYnHYU9cV=9JyffTNg6iR3OXuYHspg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:55:29 +0800
From:   Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
To:     Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: platform/chrome: some more cleanups between
 these subsystems.

Hi Enric,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:39 PM Enric Balletbo Serra
<eballetbo@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Lee, Benson,
>
>
> Missatge de Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com> del
> dia dc., 18 de jul. 2018 a les 18:11:
> >
> > Dear Lee, Benson,
> >
> > This is another patchset to try to cleanup a bit more the interaction
> > between the mfd subsystem and platform/chrome.
> >
> > The first patch moves some cros-ec include files from include/linux/mfd to
> > platform/chrome. They are specific to the lpc transport driver and are not
> > related to the mfd subsystem, so, there is no reason to have them living
> > in include/linux/mfd.
> >
> > The second patch tries to cleanup and fix some kerneldoc commments in
> > the remaining mfd/cros-ec include files. For now I only improved a bit
> > the documentation and fixed the warnings reported by kerneldoc. I think
> > that there is still a lot of improvement pending, specially in the
> > cros_ec_commands.h file, but this is something I'd like to have the
> > agreement of the chromeos folks as I know this file is used as interface
> > for the EC firmware. As far as I know the kernel doesn't cares about this,
> > but I know this is source of conflicts for the chromeos folks.
> > Usually, in the chromeos kernel, the cros_ec_commands file is synced
> > with the version available from the EC firmware but maybe we should
> > reconsider this and have a well documented file in the kernel and sync
> > in the other way. I am just thinking out loud.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Enric
> >
> >
> > Enric Balletbo i Serra (2):
> >   platform/chrome: Move mfd/cros_ec_lpc* includes to drivers/platform.
> >   mfd: cros_ec: Fix and improve kerneldoc comments.
> >
> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.h                     |  13 +-
> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c         |   3 +-
> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc_mec.c     |   3 +-
> >  .../platform/chrome}/cros_ec_lpc_mec.h        |   6 +-
> >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc_reg.c     |   3 +-
> >  .../platform/chrome}/cros_ec_lpc_reg.h        |   6 +-
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h                   | 214 +++++++------
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h          | 295 +++++++++++-------
> >  8 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-)
> >  rename {include/linux/mfd => drivers/platform/chrome}/cros_ec_lpc_mec.h (96%)
> >  rename {include/linux/mfd => drivers/platform/chrome}/cros_ec_lpc_reg.h (94%)
> >
>
> Now that rc1 was released, a gentle ping for if you can take in
> consideration these patches for 4.20.
>

Sorry for the delay. I can review these for 4.20. I'll let you know if
I have any questions.


-- 
Benson Leung
Staff Software Engineer
Chrome OS Kernel
Google Inc.
bleung@...gle.com
Chromium OS Project
bleung@...omium.org