linux-kernel - Re: Affinity managed interrupts vs non-managed interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2a6f7cf-31df-de17-82e3-eccb9cc73ed8@163.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:50 +0800
From:   Dou Liyang <dou_liyang@....com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
        Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shivasharan Srikanteshwara 
        <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Affinity managed interrupts vs non-managed interrupts

Hi Thomas,

At 09/05/2018 06:38 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Oh well. This was not intended to magically provide the solution you want
> to have. It merily changed the behaviour of the managed interrupt
> selection, which is a valid thing to do independent of the stuff you want
> to see.
> 

Thank you for clarifying it, I will send the patch independently.

> As I said that needs more thought and I really can't tell when I have a
> time slot to look at that.
> 

In this period, I am willing to be a volunteer to try to do that you
said in the previous reply. May I?


Thanks
	dou