linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAh8qsyMcL-acBf4nXq2RSE=Y43FMG8v+TuyvvmgGtkjHchAyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:23:34 +0200
From:   Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > The spi-dw driver currently only supports 8 or 16 bits per word.
> >
> > Since the hardware supports 4-16 bits per word, adapt the driver
> > to also support this.
>
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it
> much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads.

Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement
come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits?

Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need
to somehow collect yet more reviews?

Regards,
Simon