lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43293b8e-5b9d-ff51-aa3f-eb1a7b9490aa@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:01:58 +0100
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sgtl5000: avoid division by zero if lo_vag is zero

On 06/09/18 12:58, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:41:52AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> In the case where lo_vag <= SGTL5000_LINE_OUT_GND_BASE, lo_vag
>> is set to zero and later vol_quot is computed by dividing by
>> lo_vag causing a division by zero error.  Fix this by avoiding
>> a zero division and set vol_quot to zero in this specific case
>> so that the lowest setting for i is correctly set.
>>
> 
> This is a very clever patch.  How did you find the bug?

trawling through a lot of false positives from a recent cppcheck run

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ