linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] numa-balancing patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180906121750.GI24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:17:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] numa-balancing patches

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:01:50AM -0700, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-08-03 11:43:55]:
> 
> > This patchset based on current tip/sched/core, provides left out patches
> > from the previous series. This version handles the comments given to some of
> > the patches. It drops "sched/numa: Restrict migrating in parallel to the same
> > node." It adds an additional patch from Mel Gorman.
> > It also provides specjbb2005 /dbench/ perf bench numa numbers on a patch
> > basis on 4 node and 2 node systems.
> > 
> > v2: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > v1: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528106428-19992-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > 
> 
> Hi Peter, Ingo
> 
> Can you please respond with your comments suggestions.
> 
> Mel and Rik have acked most of the patches.

The patches do not contain a single ack.

But I pickd them up now. Thanks.