lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:50:44 +0100
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: ep93xx: fix test for end of loop

On 06/09/18 14:33, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The problem is that if port == ARRAY_SIZE() and "gc == &epg->gc[port]"
> then that should be treated as invalid.
> 
> Fixes: fd935fc421e7 ("gpio: ep93xx: Do not pingpong irq numbers")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
> index 68a416fc3141..b0699f57ddf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int ep93xx_gpio_port(struct gpio_chip *gc)
>  		port++;
>  
>  	/* This should not happen but is there as a last safeguard */
> -	if (gc != &epg->gc[port]) {
> +	if (port == ARRAY_SIZE(epg->gc)) {
>  		pr_crit("can't find the GPIO port\n");
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> 

Good catch! I overlooked that one.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ